Litigation · Federal Court · IRB

Refusals, Appeals, Judicial Review & Hearings

A refusal is rarely the end of the road. The key is choosing the right remedy, and acting before the deadline passes.

A refusal letter is not the final word. Immigration officers make mistakes, errors of law, unreasonable findings, and decisions reached without the fairness the law requires. The question is not whether it feels unfair; it is which remedy fits, and how quickly you must act.

Know your path

Some refusals carry a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), such as spousal and family sponsorship refusals, removal orders, and residency-obligation decisions. Many others, most visa, study permit and work permit refusals, carry no appeal, but can be challenged by judicial review at the Federal Court.

The clock is short. An application for leave and for judicial review is generally filed within 15 days for a decision made inside Canada, and 60 days for a decision made outside Canada. Missing the deadline can cost you the remedy, act quickly.

How we approach a refusal

  • Read the officer’s reasons and the GCMS notes closely to find the real basis for the decision.
  • Identify errors of law, unreasonable findings, or breaches of procedural fairness.
  • Advise on the strongest route, judicial review, appeal, reconsideration, or a stronger fresh application.
  • Where appropriate, respond to a procedural fairness letter before a refusal is even made.

Beyond a single refusal, the full range of what we handle

  • Judicial review at the Federal Court: challenging unreasonable or unfair decisions.
  • Procedural fairness letter (PFL) responses: answering an officer’s concerns before a refusal is made.
  • Reconsideration requests: asking a decision-maker to look again, where appropriate.
  • Appeals at the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD): sponsorship refusals, removal orders, and residency-obligation decisions.
  • Hearings before the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB): the Refugee Protection Division (RPD), Refugee Appeal Division (RAD), and Immigration Division.
  • Misrepresentation allegations (s. 40 IRPA): responding to fairness letters and defending against findings that can carry a five-year bar.
  • Inadmissibility & stays of removal: when your status and right to remain are at stake.

Frequently asked questions

Should I just reapply instead?

Sometimes a fresh, stronger application is the better route; sometimes it repeats the same problem. The right choice depends on why you were refused, which is exactly what we assess.

Can a consultant take my case to Federal Court?

No. Only a lawyer may represent you at the Federal Court on a judicial review.

Every matter begins with a clear, professional assessment.

Immigration, family, corporate or cross-border. We will tell you honestly what can be done, and what cannot.

Book a Consultation
WeChat 微信: yushenglawyer
诉讼 · 联邦法院 · IRB

拒签、上诉、司法复议与听证

拒签往往不是终点。关键在于选对救济方式,并在时限届满前采取行动。

拒签信并非最终定论。移民官也会出错,适用法律错误、认定不合理、或未遵循法律要求的程序公正。真正的问题不在于您觉得是否冤枉,而在于哪种救济最合适,以及您必须多快采取行动。

了解您的路径

部分拒签享有向移民上诉庭(IAD)上诉的权利,例如配偶及家庭团聚担保被拒、遣返令、居住义务裁定等。而大多数签证、学签与工签的拒签没有上诉权,但可通过向联邦法院申请司法复议来挑战。

时限很短。司法复议许可申请通常须在境内决定后 15 天内、境外决定后 60 天内 提出。错过时限可能让您失去救济机会,请尽快行动。

我们如何处理拒签

  • 仔细研读移民官的理由与 GCMS 记录,找出决定的真正依据。
  • 识别法律错误、不合理认定或程序不公。
  • 就最有力的路径提供建议,司法复议、上诉、请求重新考虑,或重新递交更有力的申请。
  • 在适当情况下,在拒签作出之前先行回复程序公正信(PFL)。

不止于一次拒签,我们处理的全部范围

  • 联邦法院司法复议:挑战不合理或不公正的决定。
  • 程序公正信(PFL)回复:在拒签作出之前回应移民官的疑虑。
  • 请求重新考虑(Reconsideration):在适当情况下请决策者重新审视。
  • 移民上诉庭(IAD)上诉:担保拒签、遣返令与居住义务裁定。
  • 移民及难民局(IRB)听证:难民保护处(RPD)、难民上诉处(RAD)与移民处(ID)。
  • 误导性陈述指控(第40条):回复公正信并抗辩可能导致五年禁入的认定。
  • 不可受理性与暂缓遣返:当您的身份与居留权受到威胁时。

常见问题

我直接重新申请不行吗?

有时重新递交一份更有力的申请是更好的选择;有时却会重蹈覆辙。正确的做法取决于您被拒的原因,这正是我们要评估的。

顾问能替我上联邦法院吗?

不能。司法复议只有律师才能在联邦法院代理您。

每一个案件,都从一次清晰、专业的评估开始。

移民、家庭、公司商业或跨境事务,我们会坦诚地告诉您:什么可以做,什么不可以做。

预约咨询
微信: yushenglawyer